Home » Articles » News » Porkopolis »  Westwood, Vigilantism and a Dirty Cop

Best of Cincinnati Card

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Wednesday, October 14,2009

Westwood, Vigilantism and a Dirty Cop

By Kevin Osborne
. . . . . . .

Cincinnati’s Westwood neighborhood is a beautiful place filled with gracefully aging homes in a mix of architectural styles, tree-lined streets, family-owned businesses and an increasingly diverse population.

It also has a spectacularly bad reputation throughout the rest of the city.

That’s mostly due to a small group of passionate residents who probably mean well but whose tactics are misguided at best, delusional and hateful at worst.

Like a bratty adolescent, this vitriolic band of citizens shows up at City Hall once or twice a year when they feel neglected, and begin making threats to city officials instead of talking like rational, sensible adults to resolve problems. Compromise and negotiation aren’t in their vocabulary; bullying and intimidation are their political tools of choice. They like nothing better than playing the dual roles of aggrieved victim and entitled patron.

This group’s pet issues include blocking increases in Section 8 housing, opposing human services funding and providing unquestioning support for any police request or action, no matter how outlandish.

If you’ve read newspapers during the past couple of years, then you probably recognize this unruly lot as members of Westwood Concern and some leaders of the Westwood Civic Association. Chief among the wild-eyed rabble-rousers are Melva Gweyn and Mary Kuhl of Westwood Concern, and President John Sess and Vice President Jim McNulty of the Civic Association.

Gweyn and Kuhl are best known recently for trying to browbeat Mayor Mark Mallory and a City Council majority into exempting police officers from layoffs this year and in 2010 as the city makes cuts to avoid a $51.5 million deficit next year. Mallory and the majority first offered for Police Department personnel to take six unpaid furlough days this year to reduce costs, like many other municipal employees, but the police union rejected it.

When the union didn’t counter with cost-saving proposals of its own, the council majority turned tough. Either agree to forego a contractual pay raise next year and make some other cuts, or 138 officers would be laid off. Howls of outrage could be heard along Montana and Harrison avenues, fanned by the many police officers who live in Westwood.

It’s important to note that the police chief never asked for the recent hires that enlarged the department’s ranks (past City Councils approved them in election years) and — even with the layoffs — the number of cops assigned to neighborhood patrols and deployed per district would remain the same.

Despite a concerted publicity campaign by Gweyn and Kuhl to exact vengeance at the polls, the majority stuck to its guns. Lo and behold, the union agreed to 4.6 furlough days or other concessions totaling $1.3 million. Translation: The majority’s plan resulted in cuts without a single officer let go.

During that period, Westwood Concern distributed a bizarre pamphlet to thousands of homes making allegations that were outright lies. “Once beyond the 2009 election, should the current majority be brought back, this same crew look to cut, within a short period, close to half of our standing police force,” proclaimed one.

The incident wasn’t an isolated one. In April, Westwood Concern criminally trespassed at a vacant home in the 2100 block of Harrison Avenue that it claimed was a crime hotspot. Although city officials previously had boarded up the home, the group said that wasn’t sufficient and began nailing plywood to windows and doors.

Just as the group began painting the wood purple, presumably because it’s the color of the Elder High School Panthers (oh, the hilarity!), members got word that police were called. They quickly beat a hasty retreat. Now, Jeff Berding — Westwood’s patsy on City Council — has the audacity to ask that the city reimburse the group $98 for the wood. Ironically, a recent visit to the home reveals it’s still not fully barricaded.

The Westwood Civic Association has its own hall of shame.

This summer, McNulty pushed the idea that the neighborhood should secede from Cincinnati and become its own city. It should be done, McNulty added, because city officials rarely respond to Westwood’s needs.

Anyone who follows City Hall closely knows that’s a bunch of hokum. Council routinely awards money for neighborhood projects including an effort last year that involved a 90-day blitz to crack down on building code violations, litter and other nuisances.

Seceding from Cincinnati would involve a laborious process that entails getting approval from the majority of Westwood property owners — many of whom likely aren’t even aware of the effort — as well as City Council’s OK. Even if successful, secession would probably raise taxes, as the neighborhood would be responsible for things like policing, street repair and garbage removal.

What Westwood activists really seem to be upset about is the influx of Section 8 housing in recent years, some of which is poorly maintained and decreases property values. The truth is the Section 8 program follows federal guidelines mostly administered by Hamilton County. Cincinnati officials have little authority. And the influx is due to the over-building of apartments there in decades past.

Originally its own small city in the late 1800s, Westwood later became part of Cincinnati and is the city’s largest neighborhood with 35,730 residents.

The activists’ behavior shouldn’t be surprising given Sess’ background. A retired Cincinnati Police sergeant, Sess initially lost his job with the department in 1997 after he applied for a job with the drug unit. The application required a polygraph test. Before the test, Sess admitted smoking pot with fellow officers in 1983 and planting marijuana on a suspect.

Although Sess was indicted by a Hamilton County grand jury, he won the case because he had signed a police form that promises officers immunity from prosecution if they tell the truth. Sess won reinstatement to his job, with back pay, in 2001.

In 2004, the Citizens Complaint Authority ruled that Sess was dishonest with investigators in a case involving a black minister and questions about his vehicle. The minister said an officer pushed him down a flight of stairs in the incident, but the officer and Sess said he simply fell. A videotape of the incident, however, proved the minister was pushed and Sess lied.

For all their breathless claims of supporting “law and order,” these organizations show little respect for the rules.

These antics surely are in the minds of prospective homebuyers and young families as they decide where they want to move. It also might explain why this sprawling neighborhood currently has no one on City Council hailing from Westwood.

Sadly, the outbursts of these activists only end up hurting this great neighborhood even more and hasten its decline.


PORKOPOLIS TIP LINE: 513-665-4700 (ext. 147) or pork@citybeat.com


Share
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
Bob
While this is clearly an op-ed piece, it is classified under the “News” section of the web-based version of CityBeat’s navigational hierarchy – you might want to ask your admin to correct that misleading categorization. So you truly think it’s a group of concerned citizens – mainly a hard-working mailman and a couple of determined, selfless middle-age women who are keeping prospective homebuyers away from the community? You think it has nothing to do with the $5 hookers and their dope-dealing pimps that parade up & down the more seedy sections of Harrison and Queen City Avenues? Seriously? The truth is Westwood remains a popular choice for new residents, as witnessed by the recent influx of families and historic preservationists who have moved into the neighborhood in the past 18 months. Oh, right – that would take some research on your part, which clearly you didn’t do for this column. No interviews, no attending meetings, no data – just more of the same rhetoric you’ve been vomiting about Westwood for years. You casually mention that chief among Westwood Concern’s “pet issues” is “blocking increases in Section 8 housing” – suggesting that they actually have been successful at doing that. Later, you state what we already know – that Section 8 is a federal program, administered locally by CMHA – and one that the city largely has no control over. Let’s start with this non-PC idea: nobody wants Section 8 housing to overtake their community. It drives down the value of property, drives out tax base, and if oversaturation occurs, the neighborhood begins to decay. Section 8 properties aren’t pretty – and a large percentage of people living in subsidized housing will tell you the one thing they want to do more than anything else is move out of it. Bullying and intimidation are the tools of Mark Mallory and his family of thugs. Why haven’t I seen it reported in CityBeat how he has referred to Leslie Ghiz as “that bitch” or how he threatened to cut off a male council member’s genitalia and stuff them down his throat for siding against the current council majority? But I would suppose you might find these exchanges rather “stimulating”, since CityBeat enjoys a healthy income from peddling porn via “body rubs” and phone sex lines. I’m guessing your real beef with the hundreds of honest, hard-working, middle-class folks who showed up to protest the police and fire layoffs at the special meeting of city council is really that it scared you. That’s right, scared you. You and your latte-sipping liberal friends aren’t used to seeing these people come out and speak their mind – because more often, it’s the social service agencies and poverty pimps who attend these meetings to cry for more money. Maybe you actually do believe all the junk you’ve written. Liberalism is a mental disorder, after all.

 

 
Yes, the building is still boarded up, I went there the other day to double check before I wrote my comments.Hey BossSexy, just a bit of information for you the plywood on the first floor windows is what you do when you BOARD up a building, you use plywood. duh! as for the second floor windows, yes they are broke out, they have been broken up for months now. Second floor windows usually are never boarded up when anyone, even the city, boards up a building. Sorry bosssexy, you have to do better.

 

Then the broken plywood on the second floor of the building was placed there by the Plywood Fairy? Sweet!

 

 
I hate when the facts get in the way of the truth but here goes: building at last check, which was several days ago, is still completely boarded up these folks were not criminally trespassing, never were charged, you have no proof of that the city had not previously boarded the building up. Yes they had come out earlier that same day because they were informed the folks were coming but that is the only reason the city made their pathetic attempt to do the job we pay them to do Funny thing Gweyn and Kuhl may have as you stated "brow beat" the mayor and council but didn't do any more than the other 100's of folks who were also at that meeting at convention center If you think that sorry excuse of a 90 day blitz helped Westwood well Kevin you are sadly mistaken. I know that you won't put the effort in to this but ask Westwood, Price Hill, Northside and ask them what type of effect this had on their community. If you expend the effort you would find the answer to be nothing Funny thing Kevin people like you think that 90 day blitz and the like is something the city should be thanked for, for spending money in Westwood but many of us think not. What we think because of many years of neglect on the citys part this sort of “dog and pony show” are a symptom of our community's problems nothing more than that. If they had been doing their job all along the neighborhood would have not gotten to the point where that sort of thing was needed. As for your OP/Ed column. I think you need to be careful Kevin, while you and I and maybe others know this, the fact that you also write news stories for citybeat can confuse people I still feel that you WERE mean to a bunch of neighborhood volunteers for no reason other than you don't like them\like their style whatever and for you to compare these neighborhood volunteers to the KKK is insane and you know better. Kevin, have you ever talked to these folks that you seem to have such a distastes for? Ever interview them and get their perspective on things in their neighborhood? I know that actually interviewing them, getting their perspectives, finding out that your preconceived ideas about exactly who they are and why\how they do what they do doesn't fit what your typical reader wants but it is a shame that you continue to bash them just because you can.

 

It's still completely boarded up? What do you call those broken windows and plywood boards on the first and second floor? Character?

 

 
First, I have a COLUMN in the OP/ED section of the paper; it's not an article in the NEWS section. Secondly, just because someone is a "volunteer" does not give them a pass. Many destructive groups are all volunteer, too. KKK, anyone? Lastly, please correct anything I got wrong. In actuality, the transcripts and documents I have involving Mr. Sess are far more damning than what I published. For instance, his defense for planting marijuana on a suspect was basically, "everybody else does it." That is both immature and, if true, troubling. Unlike a lot other Op/Ed columnists, I provide facts to back up my assertions.

 

I DONT CARE IF YOUR A GAY. U DIDNT ANSWER IF YOUR A BLACK OR A JEW!!!!!! REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER: YES ON MONZEL WINBRUN ZAMERY AND MURRY. NO ON QUALL COLE THOMAS AND HARRIS. THEY R THE PROBLEM. VOTE 4 WENSTRUP. JOHN SESS IS A GOOD MAN

 

Every fringe-y Westwood character who replies here simply proves the point of the column, unfortunately. What, if anything, does my sexuality have to do with it, Westwoodguy? Wake up, it's not 1962 anymore and you're a short-sighted anachronism.

 

Dear Kevie, You know what, you need to give up your "Ms. Thing " attitude toward your neighborhood. Try Lisp-syncing "I will survive" and perhaps shooters will Crown you Ms Pent-up Cincinnati Radical

 

 
Not sure what I wrote earlier was a personal attack. It is just my opinion that while I believe you used to do a good job a long while ago, it seems as if you have slipped into a sort of personal attack style of "journalism" which doesn't serve you or anyone well. If you really did want to write a story why not ask the folks involved their side of the story, get some facts, interview people not just do what I see as sloppy\lazy reporting. Too bad for you\your paper and its readers. That's all no attack just my opinion. Kevin just a last comment these people are just volunteers they may not be your cup of tea, you may not like their style, may not like their way of doing things but they are volunteers. While these folks are far from perfect why be so mean to them about their volunteerism? There are always plenty of people who do nothing but be critical of people who are doing work in their community but when you ask them to do something or look around sometimes those critics do not one thing for their neighborhood and Westwood like other communities have plenty of those people. PLENTY!

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close