Mason City Council to Vote Again on Ordinance to Ban Abortion

Business Community Members wrote an open letter stating “It puts our families, communities, businesses, and the economy at risk."

Oct 25, 2021 at 1:49 pm
Mason City Council is voting again on an ordinance that is set to outlaw abortion and declare Mason a “sanctuary for the unborn.” - PHOTO: GAYATRI MALHOTRA, UNSPLASH
Mason City Council is voting again on an ordinance that is set to outlaw abortion and declare Mason a “sanctuary for the unborn.”

Mason City Council is voting again on an ordinance that is set to outlaw abortion and declare Mason a “sanctuary for the unborn.”

​​According to the meeting agenda, Ordinance 2021-108 will be discussed Monday, Oct. 25 at 7 p.m. during the council's bi-monthly meeting. Council says they will be voting on the abortion ban, whether or not to declare it an emergency and “making various provisions and findings, providing for severability and establishing an effective date.”

At their last council meeting Oct. 11after four hours of discussion, members decided not to pass the motion to vote on the ban.

The legislation would completely ban abortion unless there's a "life-threatening physical condition," as well as prohibit abortion providers from establishing practices within Mason and encourage prosecution of those who support abortions through funding, transportation and more.

Mason currently has no abortion providers.

The legislation was proposed as an "emergency" and, if approved, the abortion ban would have taken hold immediately with no public challenges.

In a draft of the ordinance, the council says the find that the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe V. Wade “invented a constitutional right for a pregnant woman to kill their unborn children through abortion” and is “an unconstitutional act of judicial usurpation.” As they believe that there is nowhere in the Consitution that “even remotely suggests abortion is a constitutional right.”

They back this up by saying the council is under the opinion that fetuses are deemed human beings at the time of conception who are entitled to “full and equal protection of the laws the prohibit violence against other human beings.” 

The Mason Business Community has published an open letter to the community condemning the legislation stating that it is a risk to businesses. Inabilities to recruit, boycotts, and difficulties with investor relations are some of the risks the community gave for the passing of the ordinance. 

They say they “stand against policies and legislation that hinder people’s health, independence, and ability to fully succeed in the workplace.” 

“It puts our families, communities, businesses, and the economy at risk,” writes the members of the business community who say they believe this will set a damaging precedent and threatens the future of gender equality in Mason.”

A number of cities around the United States have approved or are considering severe abortion bans and restrictions, including in nearby Lebanon. That city council in May passed an ordinance similar to Mason's proposed ban. The ACLU of Ohio said Lebanon's legislation is “blatantly unconstitutional” and ripe for legal challenge.

“Anti-abortion politicians in Lebanon have no business interfering in people’s lives and health care,” ACLU of Ohio legal director Freda Levenson said at the time.

After the ordinance passed earlier this month, the ACLU placed a billboard in South Lebanon saying “abortion is legal in all of Ohio" because, regardless of the ban, abortion remains legal in the state up to 20 weeks gestation.

A recent Texas law outlaws abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, but also goes a step further by allowing regular citizens to sue abortion providers and those who help a woman obtain an abortion. The law provides no exception in instances of rape or incest.

The U.S. Supreme Court soon will hear a case involving Mississippi's 2018 law that outlawed abortions after 15 weeks. The outcome could affect the long-standing Roe v. Wade decision and, subsequently, legislation and healthcare throughout the country, including in Ohio.

Abortion advocates within the Buckeye State continue to battle new rounds of legislation aimed to restrict the practice. Earlier this year, the Satanic Temple filed a letter with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration arguing that its Texas members should have legal access to abortion pills. The group's attorneys contend that its status as a non-theistic religious organization should ensure access to abortion as a faith-based right. 

In the letter, the Temple argues that abortion pills Misoprostol and Mifepristone should be available for its use through the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which protects Native Americans' use of peyote in religious rituals. The Temple says those same rights should apply to the drugs it uses for its own rituals. 

Recently, a Hamilton County judge blocked a 2020 law that targeted medication abortions via telemedicine. In April of this year, the judge said the state couldn’t ban medication abortions administered through telemedicine “until final judgment is entered in this case.”

The same judge, in the same week, blocked an Ohio law regulating surgical abortion tissue disposal because the state had not created the forms, rules or regulations needed for those disposal regulations.

On April 5, Governor Mike DeWine signed an executive order bypassing the legal tangle-up and suspending “the normal rule-making procedures” and permitting the Ohio Department of Health to immediately adopt rules related to the tissue disposal law.

It's possible for someone to learn that they are pregnant at three weeks gestation, but Cleveland Clinic says that some people show no signs for months. 

Sign up for our weekly newsletters to get the latest on the news, things to do and places to eat delivered right to your inbox.

Follow us on FacebookTwitter and Instagram.